|
The
psychopedagogical basis for Zigzag Reader
The
act of reading is complex because it requires the reader to execute
many different tasks at the same time: identifying letters and words;
mentally assembling words into groups of words, comprehending the
meaning of words, of groups of words, and the general meaning of
the text being read; making inferences; automatically evaluating
his comprehension during reading and being able to readjust if incomprehension
arises.
Even
an expert reader cannot simultaneously dedicate his attention to
all these tasks (or processes). His cognitive resources would be
insufficient. In fact, the expert reader has already automatized
a good number of processes (visual word recognition, for example),
which allow him to dedicate all of his attention to the processes
that are less or not automatized (or even, "automatizable").
During learning, low level processes are automatized more quickly
and more systematically than high-level processes. The automatization
of the low level processes is a necessary condition for freeing
the "mental space" needed for higher-level processes.
One
of the major challenges of teaching reading and writing, in first
and second language teaching, concerns developing linguistic automatisms.
But this can only be achieved effectively and with consistent results
within the framework of a reading (or writing) activity in all its
complexity. It is normal to teach a new language concept (or a rule)
in the simplest context possible in order to improve the learner's
chances of understanding. However, that is only the first step in
the long and arduous learning task ahead. The real challenge resides
in the second step, namely making use of the acquired concept in
more complex reading (or writing) activities. Has the learner internalized
the new concept well enough to master it and reuse it without needing
to devote all of his attention to it? This kind of learning cannot
be achieved through artificially simple and repetitive exercises.
The learner is only brought to effectively manage and even automatize
his cognitive processes when asked to accomplish more complex and
varied tasks.
The
time factor contributes substantially to the complexity of
a given task. To see why, consider the following two examples: understanding
a sentence given the amount of time desired or needed, and understanding
the same sentence given a time constraint. The second condition
clearly places added pressure on the reader. Similarly, knowing
how to check for agreement in already written words is one thing,
but developing the automatisms for agreeing the words while in the
process of writing them down is another entirely, and requires much
more of the reader. The reason is that many things must be done
at the same time. When no time limit exists (as is generally the
case in traditional paper-based learning activities), the learner
can counter the temporal constraints by doing one thing after another
- which is precisely contrary to the development of linguistic automatisms.
This
is where the Zigzag Reader
computer program shines, both as a learning tool and an evaluation
tool, to be used with this knowledge of a temporal factor in mind.
It provides insight into the degree of comprehension of a text that
was read within a given time constraint. As many studies have shown,
speed and comprehension in reading are closely related. But we must
take care in interpreting such statements. While many researchers
agree about the pertinence of time in reading as an indicator of
the complexity of the reading task (all other things being equal),
they also agree that speed is not the only indicator. This is why
many pedagogues prefer to use the term speed of comprehension
as being the targeted objective.
Admittedly,
teaching or evaluating speed of comprehension is not an easy task.
In a classroom, the fastest reader is often not the one who has
understood the best. Occasionally, it is even quite to the contrary.
How can we resolve this dilemma? And how can we make the reader
aware of the importance of a time limit without imposing a constraint
of the type "You have two minutes to read this text",
a constraint that has little pedagogical use and is often even counterproductive?
We believe that Zigzag Reader
is a flexible computerized environment that allows for the conception
and use of in-class activities that favour the development of linguistic
automatisms, both in the first and the second language.
|